Experienced Execution Capacity for Federal Authorization, Security Engineering, and Sustainment
Federal authorization programs succeed when engineering, documentation, evidence, and execution align. Common Cyber provides experienced capacity across each of those dimensions.
Common Authorization Challenges
Authorization timelines continue to extend without clear resolution
Security documentation does not reflect the actual technical environment
Engineering and compliance teams are not aligned on priorities
POA&M items accumulate without remediation progress
Continuous monitoring exists on paper but lacks operational execution
The program needs additional experienced security engineering capacity
How Common Cyber Supports Federal Programs
RMF and ATO Execution
Support across all RMF steps — categorization, control selection, implementation, assessment, authorization, and monitoring.
NIST SP 800-53 Controls
Implementation and assessment of security controls aligned to the system's categorization and authorization requirements.
POA&M Management
Identification, documentation, tracking, and remediation of Plan of Action and Milestones items.
Security Engineering
Architecture, hardening, configuration, and integration of security controls into the technical environment.
Cross Domain Solutions
Support for CDS planning, implementation, and authorization in multi-classification environments.
Continuous Monitoring
Ongoing security status monitoring, reporting, and evidence collection to sustain authorization.
Federal Authorization Readiness Review
Establish your current authorization position, identify gaps in artifacts and evidence, and build a practical path to authorization or sustainment.
Discuss a Federal RequirementImportant: Common Cyber does not make authorization decisions. Authorization decisions belong to the responsible government authority.